Prime Minister Gaston Browne’s latest budget pronouncement—projecting US $120 million in Citizenship by Investment Programme (CIP) revenue for 2026—was delivered with trademark confidence. According to the Prime Minister, this massive intake will bolster infrastructure, strengthen fiscal reserves, finance climate resilience, support social programmes, and reinforce the government’s debt strategy.
But behind the glossy talking points lies a troubling gap between what is required by law, what has actually been audited, and what the public is told. Antiguans and Barbudans deserve better—because this is our money, and we have a right to see the facts, not the fiction.
⸻
1. When Was CIP Last Audited? A Reality Check
Here is the truth:
The last publicly available audit of CIP-related funds appears in the Director of Audit’s Report on the 2018 Public Accounts. That report captures CIP receipts as revenue (“Surplus Funds from Citizenship by Investment Programme – $22,505,427”) and reviews NDF inflows and outflows.
Since then? Silence.
No publicly accessible Director of Audit report provides a detailed evaluation of CIP funds or the National Development Fund (NDF) after 2018. There has never been a stand-alone performance audit of CIP governance, spending decisions, or accountability systems.
This is not a minor administrative lapse.
This is a constitutional failure.
⸻
2. The Constitution Is Clear — Annual Audits Are Mandatory
Section 88 of the Constitution of Antigua and Barbuda mandates that the Director of Audit shall audit and report annually on the public accounts of Antigua and Barbuda.
Not “whenever convenient.”
Not “when politically useful.”
Annually.
CIP revenue is public money. It enters the Consolidated Fund. It directly finances government operations. Therefore, it falls squarely within what must be independently audited every single year.
When annual audits are late—or missing—the public cannot verify:
• Whether the $120M projection is realistic,
• How much CIP money was actually collected in prior years,
• How much was spent,
• On what projects,
• And whether the spending adhered to the law.
The Prime Minister may be comfortable with opacity.
The Constitution is not.
⸻
3. The CIP Act Also Requires Transparency — Which Has Not Happened
Under the Citizenship by Investment Act, the government must lay a detailed six-month report before Parliament twice per year.
An independent investigation by Caribbean Investigative Journalism Network (CIJN) into the Antigua and Barbuda Citizenship by Investment Programme (CIP) was published May 20, 2022. It found that only 2 out of at least 14 required reports for the 2020–2021 period were obtainable from Parliament.
Even those reports were missing mandatory financial information, including the opening and closing balances of the National Development Fund.
If the public cannot access the reports, and Parliament cannot review the reports, then who exactly is safeguarding $100+ million in annual CIP revenue?
The answer today is: no one.
⸻
4. What Is CIP Money Really Being Used For?
The Public Has Been Given an Illusion, Not Accounting. The Prime Minister paints CIP as a financial savior—funding housing, climate resilience, infrastructure, and debt reduction. But the available records tell a different story.
Independent review of prior CIP/NDF disbursements shows usage for:
• Pension arrears,
• LIAT bailouts,
• Purchasing food during COVID,
• Carnival prize money,
• Cabinet catering at Joe Mike’s,
• Computer replacements and miscellaneous expenses.
These may or may not be justifiable expenditures—but none of them represent the development-driven, transformational projects used to justify CIP in public rhetoric.
Without audited accounts, the public cannot distinguish truth from political messaging.
And that is precisely why transparency is required by law.
⸻
5. The $120 Million Claim: A Fiscal Mirage Without Independent Verification
Placing $120 million on the revenue line of the 2026 national budget does not make the number real.
Until CIP revenue and expenditures are independently audited—as mandated by the Constitution—the Prime Minister’s figure remains:
• Unverified
• Unaudited
• Unauthenticated
• Politically convenient
The government has mastered the art of presenting numbers without evidence and projections without accountability. But the people of Antigua and Barbuda are not required to accept a budget built on faith instead of facts.
⸻
6. Why Transparency Matters
CIP is not “free money.” It carries international risks, reputational costs, and long-term national consequences.
If CIP revenue is indeed the “fiscal pillar” the Prime Minister claims, then its stewardship should be subject to the highest possible standard of audit and disclosure—not the lowest.
When millions flow without transparent accounting:
• Corruption thrives,
• Waste hides easily,
• Parliament is sidelined,
• And the public is left in the dark.
But most importantly:
A people cannot plan their future when their government refuses to account for its present.
⸻
This Is Our Money. We Have a Right to Know the Truth.
Antiguans and Barbudans deserve more than slogans and political projections.
We deserve compliance with the Constitution.
We deserve annual audits.
We deserve full disclosure of six-month CIP reports.
We deserve to know exactly how CIP funds are spent—down to the last dollar.
Because this is not the Prime Minister’s money.
It is our money.
And until the government produces audited, independently verified accounts, the claim of $120 million is not fiscal leadership—
it is fiscal theatre.